Corporate Cleanup
Are new corporate accountability measures making a difference or making a mess? Finance faculty and a Wall Street investigative journalist debate their impact.
he School of Business took another important step toward a brighter future this semester when the Board of Regents voted to approve differential tuition for the undergraduate business major at UW-Madison. Starting this fall, business undergraduates will pay a higher tuition than other majors to help maintain the quality of their business education. Remarkably, strong support for the proposal came from our undergraduate student body, particularly the Undergraduate Business Leadership Council, whose backing was critical to passage.
If we want to maintain the quality of this institution, it is natural to ask the main beneficiaries to help more with the funding.
Some concern was expressed on campus that the concept of differential tuition might enable the state to avoid “paying its share” of higher education costs. We all wish the state could do more, but Wisconsin’s economy has struggled to keep up with the national economic performance as manufacturing has adjusted to globalization. Non-discretionary public expenditures such as health care, corrections and other programs are growing faster than personal incomes and tax revenues. The result is greater difficulty in funding discretionary items such as higher education. This situation seems unlikely to change for the foreseeable future.
On the other hand, our alumni and students have been and will be served very well in the workforce by their UW degrees. The return on college degrees generally has risen dramatically in recent decades. Because the state has heavily subsidized this great university for many years, our alumni and students have been able to enjoy particularly high returns. If we want to maintain the quality of this institution, it is natural to ask the main beneficiaries to help more with the funding.
I have been told that when former Chancellor Donna Shalala first proposed adding private money to state funds on building projects, critics worried that the precedent would reduce the state’s commitment to future projects. Her position was “Do you want to build buildings, or not?” In her view, waiting for the state to pay meant going without. I think we are at the same juncture today, but today’s debate is about the defining resource of the university—human capital—the talented men and women who do world-class teaching and research. It is easier to restore a physical plant than it is to restore a depleted faculty. We wait for state money at our own peril.
The future of our school will rest with our ability to win the confidence, trust and support of our customers—full-time degree students, alumni and friends, part-time degree students, and partners in executive education. The undergraduate student support of the tuition differential was an important piece of that equation. It will provide much-needed resources to augment faculty and staff. Generous alumni support is enabling the addition to Grainger Hall and fueling the progress we see in many of our academic programs. Our own entrepreneurial efforts in part-time degree programs and executive education are contributing to a brighter future as well.
Just as alumni and other fans have shown the wherewithal to “pay for quality” in UW athletic programs, we trust that the same cycle can be built around students and alumni in academics. Annual giving is particularly important as it provides the flexibility to meet our most pressing needs.
By combining all the resources available in new and established ways, we can ensure that the School of Business provides an even higher return on investment to new generations of students. We look forward to working with you to make this strong future a reality.
Michael Knetter
Dean
Feature Stories
Are new corporate accountability measures making a difference or making a mess? Finance faculty and a Wall Street investigative journalist debate their impact.
Why companies are paying handsomely to make sure you see their brands more and more in movies, TV shows, even in the books you read.
Soaring CEO salaries are the target of increasing controversy. Will Congress step in to set limits?
Should it?
Even with good intentions on both sides, supervisor-employee relations can be fraught. A look at what keeps us from having (and being) better bosses.
JUNE 2007 VOLUME 25 NUMBER 1
EDITOR: Lari Fanlund
DESIGN: Lori Strelow, Anna Dulmes
EDITORIAL ASSISTANCE: Jennifer Asselin and Scott Voss
EDITORIAL BOARD: Alisa Robertson, Melissa Amos-Landgraf, Tina Frailey, Jim Kubek, Richard Lee, Mark Matosian, Deborah Mitchell, Kayleen Reilly, Steve Schroeder and Charlie Trevor
COVER: Product placement is all around, in places you may or may not expect, and it’s not happening by accident—as Marjani Coffey, a second-year Wisconsin MBA student in Brand and Product Management, helps illustrate.
Cover photo for UPDATE
by Bob Rashid.
UPDATE is published in print and online each June and December by Wisconsin Business Alumni to inform alumni and friends about programs and activities of the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Business and its alumni. Printing is paid for with private contributions. This issue, and previous ones, are available online. Correspondence should be sent to lfanlund@bus.wisc.edu or mailed to:
UPDATE
5151 Grainger Hall
975 University Ave.
Madison, WI 53706-1323
Visit the School of Business Web home page.